From commitment to practice: Gender mainstreaming in a contested moment
In today’s political climate – marked by elections across the US and Europe and renewed debates on reproductive rights, diversity policies, and the role of institutions – gender equality sits at the centre of intensifying political and cultural tensions. Progress continues, yet it unfolds alongside active resistance, public contestation, and policy reversals. This tension defines the current moment.
Despite its relevance, gender equality often remains as an after-thought in how many funders approach their impact models. This gap carries consequences. Gender equality serves as a reliable indicator of societal health, shaping access to resources, participation, and long-term resilience. Foundations that integrate gender across governance, culture, strategy, and grantmaking consistently achieve stronger, more durable outcomes.
Across Europe and beyond, “gender” has become a scapegoat in broader political narratives. It features prominently in debates about economic change, identity, and social cohesion. Networks of anti-gender and anti-rights actors have gained visibility and influence, contributing to more polarised public discourse and increased pressure on civil society and public-interest media.
Gender equality organisations operate under these conditions every day. Many face tightening funding environments, rising demand for support, and increasing administrative and political constraints. In several contexts, terminology linked to gender, diversity, and intersectionality requires careful handling, reflecting a broader shift in public and institutional discourse.
Philanthropy functions within this same ecosystem and is not free from these pressures. Foundations increasingly confront strategic choices about visibility, positioning, and risk. This context places even internal practices under scrutiny.
These developments shape a Europe-wide peer learning journey convened by Philea and inform the publication “Proven Practices in Gender Mainstreaming: Foundations in Conversation”. The learnings also verified by the experience of the Alliance for Gender Equality in Europe, a pooled fund that brings together funders to support grassroots organisations.
A clear pattern emerges from these explorations: gender mainstreaming operates as a continuous process of organisational change. It develops through practice, responds to external pressure, and reveals its resilience during periods of contestation.
Evidence points to the importance of internal transformation. Institutional design shapes outcomes, often in ways that remain invisible without deliberate analysis. Foundations that examine how power operates within their structures unlock more effective and equitable approaches to funding.
The King Baudouin Foundation provides a telling example. Its investment in gender-disaggregated data reshaped its understanding of homelessness. A closer look at women’s housing realities revealed hidden patterns of insecurity and precarity. These findings informed adjustments in funding priorities and service delivery, demonstrating how data can challenge dominant narratives and redirect resources.
Other foundations illustrate how structure reinforces commitment. At the “la Caixa” Foundation in Spain and Portugal, gender mainstreaming gained traction through clearly defined roles and processes. Gender focal points across programmes, supported by a transversal team and participatory internal assessment, ensured shared responsibility. Gender considerations became embedded in how decisions are made and revisited over time.
Laudes Foundation highlights the role of organisational culture. Working across climate, labour, and economic transition, it invested in sustained capacity building and developed internal champions. Gender equity became integrated into its definition of impact, strengthening coherence across its programmes.
These examples show how foundations navigate a complex environment where visibility, voice, and risk remain central concerns. Collective approaches play a critical role in this landscape. Collaboration expands room for action and reinforces confidence.
The Alliance for Gender Equality in Europe demonstrates how pooled funding can shift dynamics within philanthropy. By sharing responsibility, funders extend their reach and deepen their impact. This model supports grassroots organisations working in challenging contexts while generating insights into emerging issues. It also strengthens grantmaking practices and enables more ambitious funding decisions.
At the same time, this moment draws attention to the longstanding contributions of feminist funding practices. These approaches foreground power dynamics, prioritise flexible and core support, and respond rapidly to changing conditions. Their continued relevance offers practical guidance for a wide range of funders navigating uncertainty.
Pathways to gender mainstreaming vary across institutions, yet several principles consistently support progress. Investment in internal capacity, adaptive use of gender analysis, connections to broader systemic challenges, and ongoing peer learning all contribute to sustained change.
The peer-learning journey behind “Proven Practices in Gender Mainstreaming” highlights the role of reflection and openness in driving progress. Foundations that engage with diverse perspectives and remain responsive to evolving conditions strengthen both their strategies and their impact.
As gender equality continues to shape public debate, philanthropy’s internal practices carry increasing significance. Foundations signal their priorities through how they allocate resources, structure decision-making, and distribute power. Embedding gender within these processes strengthens institutional credibility and supports long-term progress toward more inclusive societies.
Four practical steps to strengthen gender mainstreaming:
- Develop a clear rationale
Link gender equality directly to your foundation’s mission and priorities. A gender lens can deepen impact across existing areas of work and sharpen strategic focus. - Identify a champion
Support individuals within the organisation who can advance this work. Effective champions bring legitimacy, curiosity, and sustained engagement. - Start small and build momentum
Pilot initiatives, generate learning, and refine approaches over time. Early actions create the foundation for broader organisational change. - Expand shared ownership
Embed responsibility across teams and functions. Broad engagement ensures continuity and reinforces commitment at all levels.
Through these steps, foundations translate commitments into consistent practice. In doing so, they strengthen their capacity to contribute to fairer, more inclusive societies.
Authors
